teradyneezeri: (Default)

Having written stories in Markdown, LaTeX, and ReStructured Text, I have come to realize just how much easier Markdown is to use, and how much I love using it. This very post is written in Markdown with StackEdit (link at the bottom), and you can see the raw versions of some of my posts on the new Github repository I am using to keep backups.

The syntax is very simple and readable in its plain text form. *text* or _text_ are used to denote italicized text, **text** or __text__ are for bold text, and ***text*** or ___text___ for bold and italics. You use two spaces at the end of a line to denote a line break (<br /> in HTML), a new line between paragraphs (<p></p> in HTML), and a new line with no spaces at the end of a previous line to continue a paragraph (for hard line wrapping, such as the use of 80 character limits for a single line). There is a lot more, and I highly suggest reading the syntax listing on Markdown’s project site if you want to know more (linked above).

When I write, I typically use only as much markup as I absolutely need. For the template, I use a first level header for the title, a second level header for any subtitle, and italics with line breaks for front matter information–copyright information, author information, etc…, and then a horizontal rule to separate the front matter from the inner matter. For the interior, I try to limit myself to only using italics, bold, horizontal rules, line breaks/paragraphs, and block quotes. The only time I use a table is if I need to show something tabular as one of the characters see it, for example.

The reason for these limitations is that it keeps the document extremely readable no matter what screen it is seen on. I am able to write on my laptop/desktop (StackEdit, Notepad++) or my phone (Draft, Jota+) while syncing with Dropbox (which I use solely for my writing, at least until I can afford Dropbox Pro).

It also makes it much easier to import single files into Scrivener, which I use for very large projects. Scrivener is currently only available for Windows and Mac OS X (and Linux in a beta), so there is no way to use it as a web app just yet. However, using a Markdown editor to write ideas and importing the Markdown is a very useful bit of workflow I had been using during my Mac OS X days–though back then, I had been using Mou (formerly free, will be $30 soon). There is also MDCharm for Windows and Linux, or
StackEdit if you want to use something on the web.

Perhaps I will do some tutorials or something later on, though it is not really needed. Markdown’s simplicity is what makes it such a beautiful thing1.

Written with StackEdit.


  1. Unless you are Jeff Atwood, at which point, the unambiguous specification drives you to try and hijack the standard and name without permission, then throw a fit about it on Twitter when you are called out for the actions, and finally settle on a fairly decent name that should have been used without the drama. :>
teradyneezeri: (Default)
Earlier today, I was giving some advice to someone in a chatroom to help them write. They were looking for a good tool to begin writing with on Windows, that cost no money, but did not want something as advanced as a word processor.

I mentioned that Scrivener, while a somewhat costly application, was one of the best editors for them to eventually graduate to. For the time being, I suggested simply using either Wordpad, FocusWriter, or Dark Room, all of which are free and easy to download. I also recommended that they sign up for either Evernote, or a Microsoft Account for the free OneNote application, as a note-taking application is a very handy tool.

Within moments of making these recommendations, I was textually attacked for them by another person. They effectively suggested that simply mentioning Microsoft products as an option was akin to treason against the technology world, and that only Free Software should be an option. After a few minutes of ranting and raving, they were unsurprisingly kicked from the chatroom, and more than a few people I know to be GNU/Linux users spoke of how that sort of attitude was "getting old fast".

I find it rather amusing that people still argue and attack others over such petty subjects, especially in regards to the Free Software Foundation and the followers of its founder, Richard M Stallman.

Stating that you want people to be free to use software as they see fit, then attacking others for choosing to use software that you do not agree with, angered me at one time. Over time, I have realized that the situation is much like any other involving politics. People wish to be "right", whatever that may mean, and often do not realize when they making themselves look foolish in doing so. In this case, someone championing freedom in software also seems to champion taking away the freedom to choose non-free software, therefore limiting one's actual freedom to what is deemed acceptable by an arbitrary third-party guideline created with political bias.

Personally, I shall continue suggesting both free and non-free software, whether that be Scrivener (which is licensed under a proprietary license) or FocusWriter (which is licensed under the GNU General Public License). I shall also continue to chuckle at the foolishness shown by someone who shows anger at subjects so small that they should not even be given any attention.

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
1617181920 2122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2017 06:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios